Domaine de la Romanée-Conti 2011

Romanée-Conti kors 20131116

In the foreground the vineyard Romanée-Conti with its famous cross. Further back, La Romanée is located, and on the slope up towards the forest there are various premier cru and village-level vineyards. Photo from November 2013.

May last year the Swedish importer Vinunic held a tasting of the 2011 vintage from Domaine de la Romanée-Conti, which was a highly pleasant return of a tradition initiated two years earlier with a tasting of the 2009s. 2011 was a vintage that after all resulted in reasonable volumes to sell, unlike 2010, when Vinunic didn’t do a tasting of. Instead, some of us put together our own tasting of this spectacular vintage.

2011 Burgundies in general

I thought I’d start with some words about the 2011 Burgundy vintage in general, before I move over to the DRC wines. 2011 was a rather difficult vintage in Burgundy, when an early spring was followed by several changes between hot and cold weather, together with quite a bit of rain and powerful storms, and then a quick ripening under the later part of August. Côte de Nuits had less problems with rot than Côte de Beaune. Rot was a result of some period of heat in combination with moistness.

After we were spoiled by two fabulous vintage in a row, 2009 and 2010, we have in 2011 a vintage which is more of “regular quality”. The red wines are also somewhat tough in style, and in my opinion without having shown us the phase of youthful charm that many Burgundies do. There are also a bit more than usual of green notes in the wines. I must therefore admit that I haven’t been too overenthusiastic over the red 2011s. To me, the vintages 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, and most recently 2012, have all been more charming as young and newly released, when we’re talking about the reds. I also considered the 2008s to be rather tough when the first ones were released, but already a year later some of them were more charming, something that I don’t think has happened to the 2011s.

2011 is therefore a vintage that needs time, and considering their noticeable acidity and somewhat priminent tannins, I would think that the high-level wines should get at least 10 years (2021+), and the toughest among these probably at least 15 years (2026+), to have reached a good drinking zone for my palate. If they are given that time, I think that they will come across as good wines from a classical vintage, perhaps a bit like mature 2001s or 2008s, possibly with more green notes, which tend to be easier to accept or even enjoy together with classical mature notes.

Bill Nanson of Burgundy Report keeps a very good vintage chart that tends to overlap my own impressions fairly well. He has given 2011 a warning marker for pyrazine notes, “P taint”, which means excessive green notes. The previous time this was a major problem was in 2004. (Of the red vintages 2000-2012, only 2004 and 2011 has been given this warning  marker by Burgundy Report.) He does however point out in his vintage viewpoint that 2011 doesn’t show nearly as much of these notes as 2004 did, but still criticises many wine writers for having scored many of the 2011s to highly upon first encounter. As it happens, he has lowered the overall assessment of the vintage to the same level as that for 2007, which is a lighter and fast maturing vintage, so it would be wrong to consider these two as similar in style. Bill also points out that not everyone is disturbed by the pyrazine note, and that his message is that if you know that you dislike this note, you shouldn’t buy 2011s without tasting them.

I would also like to Point out that the white 2011s, on the other hand, give a fairly ripe impression, and have been ready to drink directly from release. 2011 is one of those vintages where white and red Burgundies differ in style.

I can also say that for the red wines, I have so far liked 2012 way better than 2011, but I’ll return to saying more about 2012 another time.

Vosne-Romanée 20131116 vingårdar från höjden

Most of the grand cru vineyards in Vosne-Romanée as seen from above the hill in November 2013. I use the T intersection just to the left of the midpoint of the picture as a point of reference. From this reference: beyond (in the direction of the village) and to the left: Romanée-Saint-Vivant, that also continues beyond the small road, all the way to the left edge of the picture. In front of the T intersection and to the left: Romanée-Conti. In front of Romanée-Conti, where the rows of vines change direction from vertical to horizontal, La Romanée is located. (Richebourg is located to the left of Romanée-Conti and La Romanée and begins approximately at the left edge of the picture.) To the right of the intersection, both closer and further away: La Grande Rue, which isn’t very wide in the horizontal direction. To the right of La Grande Rue: La Tâche, that stretches towards the right edge of the Picture. The green part that lies fallow, just beyond the two poles, is a part of La Tâche. The vines closed to the camera are in the village-level vineyard Aux Champs Perdrix. Domaine de la Romanée-Conti is by a wide margin the largest vineyard owner to the vineyards visible in the Picture, since both Romanée-Conti and La Tâche are monopoles and they also own more than half of Romanée-Saint-Vivant.

Summary impressions of the 2011 DRCs

It is sometimes said of DRC that these wines always tend to be “the perfect summary of a vintage”. This means that the wines show the style of the vintage, but does so in the very best way. The 2011 DRCs definitely fit into that saying, and clearly showed a DRC interpretation of the 2011 style.

The wines came across as young and firm, similar to how 2011s usually are. The nose gave a rather cold, minerally and “chalky” impression that indicated that a firm wine was to follow. The palate did follow this up with a cool and stony note. There was also some green and “stalky” notes in the wines, but interesting enough less of green notes than typical for 2011s. A bit more about this below.

The wines were pure in their aromas, and the oak was beautifully well handled. I found these wines to show less than usual of the animal notes that can often be found in Young DRC, which made the berry notes rather prominent, in particular cherries and strawberries in various proportions. This doesn’t mean that the wines were particularly “fruity” in the sense “warm or ripe style”, but rather that the berry notes that were present became a bit more prominent in the total mix of aromas.

My first impression was that the wines were more similar to each other in the nose than the 2009s and 2010s are, but there was some difference in the amount of flowery notes. On the palate, they differ in terms of concentration and level of tannins in approximately the expected order, but to me Richebourg was actually more smooth than the Romanée-Saint-Vivant, which is usually not the case.

The wines gained from sitting in the glass, and showed deeper fruit notes and a more berry-dominated style after this contact with air.

Every year, Aubert de Villaine of DRC writes a fairly extensive vintage commentary that can be read on their website. Here is the one from 2011.

DRC and “green notes” – a small reflection

As I mentioned above, the 2011 DRCs actually does not show the pronounced green notes that some 2011s have. That this is worth pointing out is because DRCs regularly show a bit of green notes, irrespective of vintage.

The style of the DRC wines are distinctly traditional, which both means some green or “stalky” notes and animal notes. At the same time, DRCs are distinctly elegant and polished. These wines also possess quite a bit of concentration and are often quite tannic for being Burgundies, which is reinforced by a high proportion of new oak, often 100% in several of the wines. This combination menas that these wines are definitely suited for extended cellaring. At the same time, it is common for DRCs to show a lot of charm when they are newly released, before they enter into a more closed phase.

The traditional style means among other things that the stalks are included in the fermentation of the wine, in a proportion adapted to the character of the vintage. This is the origin of the green notes in the wine, which sometimes may make itself felt more as a herbaceous note that any aggressive green note that “stalkiness” may indicate. This note can also be found in vintages where high-class Burgundy “modernists” completely avoid green notes. These modernists tend to practice complete destemming before fermentation, and will (just as DRC) avoid unripe grapes.

This type of green note is therefore a standard feature of the aroma profile of traditional Burgundies and in good vintages, these notes are integrated well into the other aromas with time. These aromas include the “forest floor” or “undergrowth” type of notes that can be expected of mature Burgundies and other fine cool climate Pinot Noir.

So, a bit green notes are almost always found in DRCs to some extent, and also in the 2011s. Although these notes are bit more noticeable than the previous vintages (since both 2009 and 2010 had a bit more powerful fruit notes in the nose and generally a “bigger nose”), we’re still talking about the regular note that comes from traditional winemaking. This means that DRC has avoided to get too much of extra or disturbing green notes in their 2011s, which is very well done. I therefore return to the saying about the DRC wines as the perfect summary of a vintage!

Other DRC news

La Tâche 20131116 i träda

A part of La Tâche as seen from the road just above, in November 2013. It is not a common sight to see such a large plot in a Burgundy grand cru vineyard laying fallow. Probably, 2012 was the last vintage from this plot. Let’s hope that DRC plans to return to viticulture here, rather than changing to, say, root vegetables. :-) The perspective of this picture results in the fallow part of the vineyard looking larger than it actually is.

By the way, I have some bad news for those who may collect DRC in double magnum format and have had difficulties in securing bottles in the last couple of vintages, resulting in huge amounts of money being left over. ;-) At the tasting, we were told that since the 2008 vintage, DRC no longer bottles anything in these sizes (three liters/double magnum and above). Magnums are the largest format nowadays. The last larger format DRC bottles were 2007s.

I also suspect we will see even more fighting over the La Tâche bottles from the 2013 vintage and some years ahead. When I passed by the vineyards of Vosne-Romanée in November 2013, vines were missing in a rather big part of La Tâche. It didn’t look like they had just been uprooted, so I assume that 2012 was the last vintage produced from this plot. If they have replanted it in 2014, it should start to produce wine again in 2017 at the earliest.

DRC 20140515 flaskor

Notes on the 2011 DRCs

The notes below are from May 2014.

2011 Corton

Nose with cherries and some strawberries together with various other red berries: cranberries, lingonberries and red currants. Also some liquorice, some orange zest, and a hint of vanilla. On the palate we find cranberries, sour cherries, noticeable acidity, and a mineral note together with medium tannins. Young, in a somewhat more firm style than previous vintage, but without possessin the tough tannins. 91(+) p

2011 Échézeaux

Nose with cherries, strawberries, a hint of orange zest, some spice notes, chalky minerality, and some smoke. Palate with strawberries, very noticeable minerality, good acidity, and mild tannins. Young but somewhat approachable. 92(+) p

Compared to the Corton, the 2011 Échézeaux gives a “lighter” impression in the nose and displays a cooler style with more minerality. At present, the nose is more expressive than the palate.

2011 Grands Échézeaux

Nose with cherries, strawberries, some herbaceous/green notes, chalky minerality, and a somewhat closed impression. Palate with strawberries, cherries, high acidity, medium tannins that are a bit more noticeable than in most other wines, and a firm finish. Young and in a bit of a hard style, 92+ p.

Tougher and less approachable than the Corton & Échézeaux, at present the toughest wine of the six tasted.

2011 Romanée-Saint-Vivant

Nose with cherries, strawberries, some herbaceous/green notes, some undergrowth, a chalky note, and slightly flowery. Palate with cherries, noticeable minerality, high acidity, noticeable tannins, and a long aftertaste with minerality. Young and distinctly firm, the palate younger than the nose, good substance, 93+ p.

More traditional DRC nose than the three previous wines. Firmer and less approachable than a RSV from DRC is usually as Young, i.e., doesn’t quite show itself from the elegant flowery side. Instead, it is the somewhat tough and cellaring-demanding side of the vintage that dominate my impression of this wine.

2011 Richebourg

Nose with strawberries and cherries, spice notes, minerality, some vanilla; gives a rather closed-down impression. Palate with ripe strawberries with noticeable minerality, some roundness and viscosity, and rather prominent medium tannins. Young, 94+ p.

The Richebourg has a more closed-down nose than the RSV, but a rounder palate and more substance. At present it actually comes across as softer than the 2011 RSV, which has usually not been the case with other vintages!

2011 La Tâche

Nose with cherries, chalky minerality, spice notes, hints of undergrowth; gives a rather closed-down impression. Palate with ripe strawberries and cherries, powerful concentration, quite a lot of minerality, and a noticeable firmness. Young, at present the least “open”, most substance, 95+ p.

As usual, La Tâche is the biggest of the wines, with RSV-Richebourg-La Tâche representing increasing concentration and substance.

Other wines in connection with the tasting

Vinunic 20140515 Roederer JadotWe also tasted two non-DRC wines to the menu served:

2007 Louis Roederer Brut Vintage
Champagne

Bready, fresh palate with citrus and green apple, good acidity. Pleasant development, but this vintage is not a heavyweight. 89 p

2009 Louis Jadot Meursault Genevrières
Burgundy, Chardonnay.

A lot of citrus, good concentration, good acidity, minieral, rather approachable “2009 style”. 91 p

After the tasting, at another (home) address, we rounded off with:

2004 Château d’Yquem
Sauternes, in this case a half bottle.

Nose with saffron, dried apricots, a light “glue note” – classical Sauternes with some development. The palate is “regular sweet” with good concentration, again dried apricots, good acidity, fine balance, and some development. 93 p

This bottle showed more freshness than the 2004 Yquem in half bottle that I tasted a few months before, in that case a bottle from my own cellar.

Swedish version here.

Posted in 2011, Burgundy, Pinot Noir | Leave a comment

Champagne village profile: Vandeuil in the Vallée de la Vesle

Key facts

Located in: Montagne & Val de Reims: Vesle et Ardre
Vineyards and grape varieties: 34.9 hectares (86.2 acres), of which 60% Pinot Meunier, 33% Pinot Noir and 7% Chardonnay.
Classification: “Autre cru” (86%)

Map

The map is linked from Wikimedia Commons, and the geographical information originates from OpenStreetMap. The dotted white area corresponds to the vineyards, light yellow is other open terrain, and green indicates forest.

Neighbouring villages

North: Montigny-sur-Vesle (part of the area Massif de Saint-Thierry)
Northeast: Jonchery-sur-Vesle
Southeast: Branscourt
South: Savigny-sur-Ardres
West: Hourges
Comment: the remaining links will be added when those profiles have been uploaded.

The village

Vandeuil is located on top of the northwestern part of the Montagne de Reims hill, at a small stream that empties into the Vesle river via Jonchery-sur-Vesle, the neighbouring village. In the north, the commune stretches all the way to the Vesle.

The Vandeuil commune covers 535 hectares and has 212 inhabitants (as of 2012), referred to as vandoliens and vandoliennes.

Vineyards

The vineyards of Vandeuil are gathered in one block to the west and north of the village, and consist of east- to south-facing slopes with Pinot Meunier as the most common grape variety.

The current vineyard surface in the Vandeuil commune is 34.9 hectares (86.2 acres). There are 21.1 ha Pinot Meunier (60.4%), 11.4 ha Pinot Noir (32.8%) and 2.4 ha Chardonnay (6.8%). Numbers from CIVC, as of 2013. In 1997, the vineyard surface was 34 ha. There are 17 vineyard owners (exploitants) in the commune.

Champagne producers

Champagne growers

Producer status is indicated where known: RM = récoltant-manipulant, or grower-producers. RC = récoltant-coopérateur, growers that are cooperative members but sell Champagnes under their own name.

  • Bruno Cajdler (RC)
  • Yves Morel (RM), also called Morel for short.
  • Serge Griffon (RC)

Comment: It is not certain that the list is complete.

Cooperatives

  • Société Coopérative Vinicole is a cooperative with 40 members that have a total of 45.66 ha.

Links

© Tomas Eriksson 2015

Posted in Champagne villages | Leave a comment

Champagne village profile: Hourges in the Vallée de la Vesle

Key facts

Located in: Montagne & Val de Reims: Vesle et Ardre
Vineyards and grape varieties: 29.5 hectares (72.9 Acres), of which 40% Pinot Meunier, 34% Chardonnay and 25% Pinot Noir.
Classification: “Autre cru” (86%)

Map

The map is linked from Wikimedia Commons, and the geographical information originates from OpenStreetMap. The dotted white area corresponds to the vineyards, light yellow is other open terrain, and green indicates forest.

Neighbouring villages

East: Vandeuil
South: Serzy-et-Prin
Southsouthwest
: Crugny
Northwest: Unchair
Comment: Hourges is located in the outskirts of the Champagne appellation, so some of the neighbouring villages visible on the map are not included in the list above, since they are not Champagne villages and therefore will not be profiled.

The church in Hourges against a grey autumn sky. Picture linked from Wikimedia Commons (photo Gérald Garitan, Bovember 2010).

The village

The town hall (mairie) of Hourges, that is combined with a school building. Picture linked from Wikimedia Commons (photo Gérald Garitan, November 2010).

Hourges is located on top of the northwestern part of the Montagne de Reims hill, along a small stream that empties into the Vesle river in the neighbouring commune, Breuil.

The Hourges commune covers 434 ha and has 81 inhabitants (as of 2012), referred to as hourgeois and hourgeoises.

Vineyards

The vineyards of Hourges are gathered in two blocks, one smaller immediately to the south of the village, and one slightly larger a little to the west of the village. The vineyards consist of slopes of varying direction and although Pinot Meunier is the most common grape variety, the proportion of Chardonnay is unusually high for the Vesle et Ardre area.

The current vineyard surface in the Hourges commune is 29.5 ha (72.9 acres). There are 12 ha Pinot Meunier (40.2%), 10.3 ha Chardonnay (34.4%) and 7.6 ha Pinot Noir (25.4%). Numbers from CIVC, as of 2013. In 1997, the vineyard surface was 26 ha, and in the early 1950s there was apparently only about 5 ha of vineyards in the village, with two owners. Today, there are 10 vineyard owners (exploitants) in the commune.

Champagne producers

Champagne houses/négociants

The producer status NM = négociant-manipulant means that purchased grapes can be included in the Champagnes. NM producers can be anything from small producers that supplement their own grapes with some that they buy in, to large Champagne houses that primarily rely on purchased grapes.

  • Jean Lefebvre (NM), also sells Champagnes under the brand:
    • Jean Richecourt

Champagne growers

Producer status is indicated where known: RM = récoltant-manipulant, or grower-producers. RC = récoltant-coopérateur, growers that are cooperative members but sell Champagnes under their own name.

Comment: It is not certain that the list is complete.

Links

© Tomas Eriksson 2015, senaste uppdatering 2015-02-26

Posted in Champagne villages | Leave a comment

Champagne village profile: Unchair in the Vallée de la Vesle

Key facts

Located in: Montagne & Val de Reims: Vesle et Ardre
Vineyards and grape varieties: 42 hectares (103.8 acres), of which 49% Pinot Meunier, 35% Chardonnay, and 16% Pinot Noir.
Classification: “Autre cru” (86%)

Map

The map is linked from Wikimedia Commons, and the geographical information originates from OpenStreetMap. The dotted white area corresponds to the vineyards, light yellow is other open terrain, and green indicates forest.

Neighbouring villages

Southeast: Hourges
South: Crugny
Southwest
Courville
Comment: Unchair is located in the outskirts of the Champagne appellation, so some of the neighbouring villages visible on the map are not included in the list above, since they are not Champagne villages and therefore will not be profiled.

The village

Unchair is located on top of the northwestern part of the Montagne de Reims hill, along a small stream that empties into the Vesle river in Breuil, the neighbouring commune.

The Unchair commune covers 373 ha and has 158 inhabitants (as of 2012), referred to as unchairois and unchairoises.

Vineyards

The vinyards of Unchair are all located just north of the village, and consist of southeast-facing slopes. Pinot Meunier is the most common grape variety, but the proportion of Chardonnay is high for a village in the Vesle et Ardre area.

The current vineyard surface in the Unchair commune is 42 hectares (103.8 acres). There are 20.7 ha Pinot Meunier (49.2%), 14.5 ha Chardonnay (34.6%), and 6.8 ha Pinot Noir (16.1%). Numbers from CIVC, as of 2013. In 1997, the vineyard surface was 38 ha. There are 26 vineyard owners (exploitants) in the commune.

Champagne producers

Champagne growers

Producer status is indicated where known: RM = récoltant-manipulant, or grower-producers. RC = récoltant-coopérateur, growers that are cooperative members but sell Champagnes under their own name.

Comment: It is not certain that the list is complete.

Links

© Tomas Eriksson 2015. last update 2015-02-25

Posted in Champagne villages | Leave a comment

Albert Schoech – a good Alsace producer in Ammerschwihr

A new acquaintance at the Alsace wine day in Stockholm some weeks ago was Albert Schoech, a producer located in Ammerschwihr (village profile at Per Warfvinge’s Alsace wine site). Although I didn’t have time to taste through the wines from all the “classics” I though I should at least try out one producer I wasn’t familiar with. Then U.M. strolled by and mentioned “those ones were good!”, pointing in the direction of the table where Albert Schoech’s wines were poured.

I got a very positive impression of these wines, since the showed good concentration of aromas and were mostly dry. This is a combination that not all Alsace producers pull off. On the Riesling side, the wines were fully dry, just as they should (when we’re in Alsace), and I was definitely impressed by the two grand cru Rieslings. It was a very positive surprise to find a producer that was completely unknown to me, but was of this style and quality. In many cases, if the concentration is good and the fruit is there, the residual sugar runs away a bit more, and also tend to vary between wines and vintages. Here, I found the style to be consistent across the wines tasted. (That a Gewurztraminer from the region’s southernmost grand cru vineyard has some residual sugar is not unexpected, and doesn’t change my overall judgment of “mostly dry”.) If I should add a small caveat, it must be that the two grand cru Riesling wines are both from a truly great vintage, 2010, where the wines show a lot of freshness and balance thanks to the high level of acidity. The vintage character will also make it easier for wines to come across as dry. So I don’t really know how the Albert Schoech wines come across in weaker vintages, or in vintages that go a bit more in the hot and ripe direction, such as 2009 or 2011.

On their website, they mention five grand cru vineyards (Kaefferkopf, Florimont, Sommerberg, Mambourg, Winneck-Schlossberg), but two of three grand cru wines that were presented for tasting were actually from other vineyards: Eichberg and Brand. More than that, I don’t know too much about this producer. They present their history and these five grand cru vineyards at the website, but not which other wines they produce. Two Crémants were on also available for tasting, but I didn’t try them.

Albert Schoech 20150126

The wines with the black labels are the grand crus, the other wines have yellow labels.

2013 Alsace 2013
A blend of 45% Sylvaner, 28% Chasselas, 20% Riesling, and 7% Muscat.

Nose with citrus, discrete flowery notes, and some mineral. The palate is completely dry  (1 on the sweetness scale 1-9) with a lot of citrus including grapefruit, mineral, and a firm impression. Definitely a fresh style, 85 p.

A good “Edelzwicker” although the label doesn’t use that designation. The only Albert Schoech wine stocked by the Swedish importer, and sold at a very reasonable price.

2013 Pinot Blanc Réserve

Fruity nose with melon, some honey, and some mineral. Dry palate with citrus, mineral, good acidity and light spicy notes. Fresh, 86 p

2013 Riesling Réserve

Nose with peach, stony minerality and discrete perfume notes. Dry palate with stony minerality, citrus, some green apple and hints of spice. Definitely firm, 87 p

2013 Pinot Gris Réserve

Nose with fried apple, pear, some spice notes, and a bit of an “odd” note that I can’t find a good description for. Practially dry on the palate (1-2 on the scale 1-9) with citrus, spice notes, good concentration and good acidity. Fruity aftertaste, balanced, 87-88 p

2013 Gewurztraminer Réserve

Nose with lychee, honey and spice notes. The palate is almost dry (2? on the scale 1-9) with noticeable spice, medium acidity, and a light bitterness. Foody, 87 p

2010 Grand Cru Eichberg Riesling
A vineyard in Eguisheim.

Nose with peach, stony minerality, and a hint of perfume. Dry palate with stony minerality, citrus, high acidity, and a firm aftertaste with grapefruit. Definitely good and rather young, 90(+) p

2010 Grand Cru Mambourg Riesling
A vineyard in Sigolsheim.

Nose with citrus and some zest, stony notes with petroleum and a hint of honey. Dry palate (but unlike Eichberg not totally bone dry) with citrus, peach, good concentration, mineral, high acidity and an aftertaste with citrus. Quite good and rather young, 91(+) p

2012 Grand Cru Brand Gewurztraminer
A vineyard in Turckheim, and the southernmost grand cru of Alsace.

Nose with honey and lychee with a distinct spicy note, peach, and a discrete note of something green (asparagus?). The palate is reasonably dry (2-3 on the scale 1-9) with powerful concentration and viscosity, honey, noticeable spice, medium acidity, and a spicy aftertaste with notes of spicy honey. Quite good, 90-91 p.

Swedish version here.

Posted in Alsace, Gewürztraminer, Pinot Blanc, Pinot Gris, Riesling | Leave a comment

Champagne village profile: Saint-Gilles in the Vallée de l’Ardre

Key facts

Located in: Montagne & Val de Reims: Vesle et Ardre
Vineyards and grape varieties: 3.1 hectares (7.7 acres), of which 65% Pinot Noir and 35% Pinot Meunier.
Classification: “Autre cru” (82%)

Map

The map is linked from Wikimedia Commons, and the geographical information originates from OpenStreetMap. The dotted white area corresponds to the vineyards, light yellow is other open terrain, and green indicates forest. The red-marked dashed border is the departmental border between Marne (which includes Saint-Gilles) and Aisne.

Neighbouring village

SoutheastCourville
Comment: Saint-Gilles is located in the outskirts of the Champagne appellation, so some of the neighbouring villages visible on the map are not included in the list above, since they are not Champagne villages and therefore will not be profiled.

The church of Saint-Gilles, Église Saint-Pierre. Picture linked from Wikimedia Commons (photo Martpan, 2012).

The village

Saint-Gilles is located on top of the northwestern part of the Montagne de Reims hill, along the Ardre river.

The Saint-Gilles commune covers 637 hectares and has 275 inhabitants (as of 2012), referred to as saint-gillois and saint-gilloises.

Vineyards

The vineyards of Saint-Gilles are located to the immediate southwest of the village, and consists of southeast-facing slopes with mixed Pinot varieties.

The current vineyard surface in the Saint-Gilles commune is 3.1 hectares (7.7 acres). There are 2 ha Pinot Noir (64.8%) and 1.1 ha Pinot Meunier (35.2%). Numbers from CIVC, as of 2013. In 1997, the vineyard surface was also 3 ha. There are 3 vineyard owners (exploitants) in the commune.

Champagne producers

I haven’t found any Champagne producers that have their seat in Saint-Gilles.

Links

© Tomas Eriksson 2015

Posted in Champagne villages | Leave a comment

Champagne village profile: Courville in the Vallée de l’Ardre

Key facts

Located in: Montagne & Val de Reims: Vesle et Ardre
Vineyards and grape varieties: 37.5 hectares (92.7 acres), of which 62% Pinot Meunier, 29% Pinot Noir, and 9% Chardonnay.
Classification: “Autre cru” (82%)

Map

The map is linked from Wikimedia Commons, and the geographical information originates from OpenStreetMap. The dotted white area corresponds to the vineyards, light yellow is other open terrain, and green indicates forest.

Neighbouring villages

Northeast: Unchair
Southeast
: Crugny
South: Arcis-le-Ponsart
Northwest: Saint-Gilles
Comment: Courville is located in the outskirts of the Champagne appellation, so some of the neighbouring villages visible on the map are not included in the list above, since they are not Champagne villages and therefore will not be profiled.

Courville and surroundings. Picture linked from Wikimedia Commons (photo Anatole Boissier, 2012).

The village

TheArdre river at Courville. Picture linked from Wikimedia Commons (photo Garitan, 2012).

Courville is located on top of the northwestern part of the Montagne de Reims hill, along the Ardre river.

The Courville commune covers 1 194 hectares and has 460 inhabitants (as of 2012), referred to as courvillois and courvilloises.

Vineyards

The vineyards of Courville consists of mild south-facing slopes that are located north to east of the village, on the right bank of the Ardre, with Pinot Meunier as the most common grape variety.

The current vineyard surface in the Courville commune is 37.5 hectares (92.7 acres). There are 23.4 ha Pinot Meunier (62.3%), 10.8 ha Pinot Noir (28.8%), and 3.4 ha Chardonnay (9%). Numbers from CIVC, as of 2013. In 1997, the vineyard surface was 29 ha. There are 9 vineyard owners (exploitants) in the commune.

Champagne producers

Champagne growers

Producer status is indicated where known: RM = récoltant-manipulant, or grower-producers. RC = récoltant-coopérateur, growers that are cooperative members but sell Champagnes under their own name.

Comment: It is not certain that the list is complete.

Links

© Tomas Eriksson 2015, last update 2015-02-23

Posted in Champagne villages | Leave a comment